Being a student I went to the Tate to view the Exposed: Voyeurism exhibition and was terribly dissapointed. Me and other 6th form students were taken to admire new artists and take in insipiration from my work but I found myself annoyed and stressed after seeing the exhibition. On the information desk it stated 'some images may be found challenging' which was expected as voyeurism is obviously mostly used for sexual gratification. We paid £7 for the tickets and proceeded into the exhibition. I enjoyed the first stages of the exhibition, admiring all the beautiful images and the different artists, however when reaching a certain point, a very serious and patronizing woman asked our age. Our group was mostly 17 years old, despite a few 15/16 year old lower years that had attended. She proceeded to tell us that there was and 18+ restriction on the further part of the gallery. Our teacher took us into it, and the man didn't seem to mind as we were obviously on a trip. The pictures were brilliant and I'd studied the photographer before. However, I felt extremely sympathetic towards the lower years that missed out on the projected images. The slideshow was a 42 minute long set, meaning that was the area that consisted of the most images. The reason why it was 18+ was because of male nudity. However I also found this annoying as in the main gallery that could be viewed by all, it showed women being raped, oral sex being performed on the women and a variety of different 'shocking' things. Which I took as art. I found it strange that they had to section off a seperate exhibition just for male nudity. I also felt annoyed as I felt they should have notifyed us when purchasing tickets- as there were alot of dissatisfied students who didn't gain alot. I believe they should have put a sign saying 'all images past this point are sexually explicit, enter at your own risk'. Alot of people paying for the show aren't going to go in mocking the art, its art at the end of the day.